Lawrence v. Texas-Dissent Thomas
From dKosopedia
Category: Supreme Court decisions
on writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
June 26, 2003Justice Thomas, dissenting.
I join Justice Scalia 's dissenting opinion. I write separately to note that the law before the Court today "is ... uncommonly silly." Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479, 527 (1965) (Stewart, J., dissenting). If I were a member of the Texas Legislature, I would vote to repeal it. Punishing someone for expressing his sexual preference through noncommercial consensual conduct with another adult does not appear to be a worthy way to expend valuable law enforcement resources.
Notwithstanding this, I recognize that as a member of this Court I am not empowered to help petitioners and others similarly situated. My duty, rather, is to "decide cases 'agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.' " Id., at 530. And, just like Justice Stewart, I "can find [neither in the Bill of Rights nor any other part of the Constitution a] general right of privacy," ibid., or as the Court terms it today, the "liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions," ante, at 1.
Opinions
- Syllabus
- Opinion (Download PDF court opnion)
- Concurrence-O'Connor
- Dissent-Scalia
- Dissent-Thomas
- Article on Lawrence v. Texas
- Article on Key SCOTUS Decisions