User talk:Roger

From dKosopedia

Roger, you're veering close to being banned. No editorializing. The second part of the "Secular Jew" article is a case in point. And your feelings about Noam Chomsky doesn't mean you can remove him from the reading list article. Yes, he has cherry picked at times but he's also spot on at times. Others can take him for what he's worth. Thanks for sourcing the Colbert article. I'm not going to unlock the Jim Webb page because at this point I don't trust you enough. Nothing personal, but so far you have too heavy a hand. --Centerfielder 07:41, 31 July 2007 (PDT)

I've unprotected the Jim Webb article, so change it as you see fit. Remember, though, to source what needs to be sourced; "I read this in a magazine" isn't quite enough. And we're really trying to be non-inflammatory. That doesn't require NPOV (neutral point of view), as Wikipedia does, but it does mean truthful and accurate. Claims should be sourced; no editorializing; avoid adjectives and adverbs. The truth is ever so much more convincing than invective. --Centerfielder 13:46, 31 July 2007 (PDT)