Pyrrho:I-m not what I didn-t used to not be
From dKosopedia
I'm not what I didn't used to not be.
I'm not sorry that I'm not. That doesn't mean "didn't used to be"-ing isn't what it didn't used to not be. It is. And that is why there doesn't not come to be in a man's life a time to not not be the way one needs not be, or even to be. I don't not feel now that I wasn't not wrong then, so much as that I was not ever not wrong at any time that is not never. Time is a river and progress is a stairway and so I don't not never stop upon the staircase. But neither do I stop forever. So to say I havn't not never been wrong is not the same as not having needed to not fail to not regress nor remain static, but progress, if not always then not never and overall.
My views are no different not from those they weren't not different from then. They're merely not less not unrough and not less not unhewn.
And neither now do I not expect to not never leave this step which was already not uneasy to not never reach in the first place. I will make it a step or two farther, or aim to, although I am not without fate to never not die on none of these steps, for one day it will be on one of them, to not be not specific is natural. So naturally I don't not prefer never to not ask questions. I in fact prefer to not rarely not ask them, just not exclusively. I'm not saying I don't not appreciate the dangers that not advocating poses, but I'm naturally inquisitive and not normally don't not advocate, actually. Still, even as I don't not avoid not avoiding, the admitting that I don't advocate, and even advocate that I don't not advocate, I actually do naturally advocate, and it's merely that I don't not separate advocacy from inquiry and so...
It's just that before I can advocate the answer, I have to convince you there is a question.